Article Mashup for Bridge Theory

A deep connection established between the observer or user, and the object establishes a language to satisfy their experience in order to recognize geometrical coherence. The organized complexity of natural materials satisfies all the patterns to become an ordered geometrical coherence.There is a desire to intimidate due to use of scale, use of distortions, curvature and gradients which is not of importance. What counts is the relation between the work and life with deeper aspects of culture and life but these might be somewhat chaotic and unbalanced. Buildings might retain their obdurate separateness as objects but are marked and defined by humanity over time. Twentieth-century buildings were built using entirely new perspective of organized coherence to explore a architecture less as a fixed artefact and rather as the ongoing transformation of the site. The timelessness of architecture and its traditional distinctions between buildings and ecology, and between beauty and utilitarian structure are blurred in order to obtain pure and beautiful innovative architectural expressions.

References:

Nikos Salingaros, “Unified Architectural Theory,” http://www.archdaily.com/611788/unified-architectural-theory-chapter-9a/#more-611788 (accessed on 27/5/15)

Catherine Slessor, “Architects Don’t Invent, They Transform,” http://www.archdaily.com/604164/ar-issues-architects-don-t-invent-they-transform/#more-604164 (accessed on 27/5/15)

Rory Stott, “Spotlight: Rafael Moneo,” http://www.archdaily.com/629147/spotlight-rafael-moneo/ (accessed on 27/5/15)